• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Texas A&M Forest Service
  • Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  • Texas A&M College of Agrculture and Life Sciences
Ellison Chair in International Floriculture
Ellison Chair in International FloricultureTeaching, Research, Extension and Service
  • Menu
  • #1593 (no title)
  • Benefits of Plants and Greenscapes
  • Plants, Nature, and Health Initiative
  • Marketing & Economics
  • Water Resources
  • Sustainability
  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)

Effect of Stimulus on Green Industry

February 6, 2008 by Charlie

To combat the recent slowing of the U.S. economy, Congress is currently working to develop a fiscal-oriented stimulus package. The House has approved its version and the Senate is currently attempting to do the same.

The House plan would send rebates of $600-$1,200 to about 111 million Americans who receive paychecks of $3,000 or more, plus an additional $300 per child, with less available to individuals with income in excess of $75,000 and couples making more than $150,000. The Senate version has checks of $500-$1,000 for a broader group that includes 20 million seniors and 250,000 disabled veterans, and taxpayers making up to $150,000 — or $300,000 for individuals. The Senate package also includes a $14.5 billion unemployment extension for those whose benefits have run out, $1 billion in heating aid for the poor — a program that enjoys broad bipartisan support — and a tax break that allows businesses suffering losses to reclaim previously paid taxes. It includes $10 billion in mortgage bonds to help homeowners refinance their loans and several tax breaks for renewable energy. – Houston Chronicle, 2/06/08.

Recent debate over the ability of the $148-$157 billion stimulus package being considered by Congress to actually bolster the domestic economy begs the obvious question: What will be the potential impact of said stimulus on the economy and how much of it will translate into sales of green industry products and services? Not an easy question to address, but perhaps we can glean from the experience of the 2001 stimulus package to draw some conclusions.

In the summer of 2001, the government mailed a total of $38 billion in $300/$600 one-time rebate checks to two-thirds of U.S. households. A 2004 study by U.S. Labor Dept. economists, Princeton University, and the Univ. of Pennsylvania estimated that the rebates increased aggregate consumption expenditures by about 0.8% in the 3rd quarter of 2001 and 0.6% in the 4th quarter. Two University of Michigan economists found that the tax incentive added 100-200,000 jobs and increased GDP by a scant 0.1 to 0.2%. – WSJ, 1/19-20/08, p.A6. One other [debatable] point is that University of Michigan economists estimated that only 20 percent of the 2001 stimulus rebate check injection was actually spent on consumer goods. The rest was used to either pay down debt or put into savings. — Austin American Statesman, 1/19/08, p.A17.

Interestingly, this time around, according to Jason Furman at the Brookings Institute, as many as 57 million households (37% of total households) would receive no benefit under the plan as currently structured.

Of the households that may indeed receive rebate checks this year, the timing of their receipt may have an influence on whether any expenditures are made on lawn and garden products and services. If checks are received by mid-to-late May or early June, there may be opportunity for such spending to occur in lawn and garden retail outlets. Otherwise, the vast majority of purchases may end up on ‘unnecessary plastic objects’ from offshore manufacturers (e.g. China) thereby being a primary stimulus for economies other than ours!

Another point to consider is that rebate checks (by themselves) are not likely to spur any lifestyle changes or fund any major asset purchases. This is in keeping with the late economist Milton Friedman’s “permanent income hypothesis” which said that people do not change their spending habits based on small blips in their income. In short, you can’t fool people into thinking they are richer than they really are.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: economic forecasts, green industry, stimulus

Recession Resistance: Real or Wishful Thinking?

February 5, 2008 by Charlie

During a presentation today (click here to view) at the 2008 Tennessee Nursery and Landscape Association Winter Education conference, I emphasized what I feel is the key business strategy that growers, landscape service firms, and retailers must embrace in order to survive the maturity stage of the green industry life cycle – differentiation – that is, specializing by product, services offered, customer type, or geographic area. Of course, in setting the stage for this differentiation discussion, current industry trends had to be reviewed to prove the initial supposition that the green industry is indeed maturing. Trends in grower-level nursery and greenhouse sales, DIY lawn and garden activities, and the recent growth in lawn & landscape services were presented, with several anecdotal observations including the industry’s historical recession resistance, correlation to housing starts, and factors affecting the cost-price squeeze being felt by all industry participants. No sooner had I packed away my laptop away and turned my blackberry back on did I receive an email from my esteemed colleague, Dr. Marvin Miller of Ball Horticulture, sharing a recent pontificating regarding the very concept of recession resistance that I had just discussed. Marvin writes:

“You might hear comments suggesting our industry has always been recession proof, but that is a piece of “ancient history.” Historically, when the industry was dominated by cut flowers and many of these were used for funerals and other traditional occasions, the industry may have been somewhat resilient even in times of economic stress. Over the last 30 years, our society’s use of funeral flowers has dramatically declined, but more importantly, the majority of purchases of our industry’s products are now focused in less tradition-bound occasions. Indeed, during the late-1980s recession, our industry was affected, as hotel after hotel removed foliage plants from their atria and lobbies in cost-cutting initiatives; it was the weekly maintenance of these plants that was more of concern than the cost of the plants per se. Similarly, supermarket sales of floricultural products slowed during that recession, as consumers found a way to cut back on their grocery bills by reducing self-consumption.

Today, the bedding/garden category so dominates domestic production and accounts for a major share of consumption. If a recession does come, we may be writing a different story altogether on its effect on industry sales. Some would argue that we will be affected as consumers find another way to save money. Others might argue that consumers will save on vacations and other travel costs and instead spend that time at home, perhaps, spending even more effort on their own garden. I know if I owned a garden center right now, I would certainly be preparing POP materials that expressed the sentiment that one should “plant a little vacation paradise in your own backyard.” Certainly, one could argue that a good share of our industry’s sales go to folks that will feel proportionately less pain during a recession; in this scenario, independent garden centers may fare much better than chain stores focusing on consumers with more modest incomes. Whatever the outcome, the next few months will be interesting.”

I couldn’t agree more Marvin. In a follow-up phone conversation later in the day, we agreed that this phenomenon of recession resistance can be validated quite readily anecdotally, but proving it with actual data is a little trickier. Personally, I like to point to the most recent recessionary period (2001) for comparative purposes due to its similarity to the current economic conditions in which we find ourselves (see earlier posts). In the 2001-02 period, grower-level sales continued to expand, as well as DIY lawn & garden activities and landscape services demanded. It wasn’t until after the recession was over that DIY lawn & garden retail sales started declining. This was perhaps more a result of Boomers maturing and demanding more DSIFM (do-some-of-it-for-me) services than any post-recessionary effects. A perfect proof of our theorem? Maybe. I think I’ll reserve that conclusion until at least the 1st quarter of 2009!

Filed Under: News Tagged With: recession

Green roofs generate green dollars

January 31, 2008 by Charlie

Green roofs are not only a significant part of sustainable development but represent a potentially significant market for Green Industry products and services. Dr. Brad Rowe, Associate Professor in the Dept of Horticulture at Michigan State recently presented a seminar on this timely topic. Click here to view his presentation.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: green roofs

Economic indicators point to uncertain times in 2008

January 30, 2008 by Charlie

A recent post on the TNLA Viewpoint blog captures some of the economic inicators pertinent to the Green Industry. Click here to view these important measures to consider in making your strategic business plan for 2008.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: economic forecasts

Stimulus package debate

January 29, 2008 by Charlie

Will the economy be stimulated by the House/White House stimulus package? Jason Furman, a advisor to President Clinton, and author-economist Steven E. Landsburg discuss the U.S. economy and the recently announced stimulus package. Click here to hear a good synopsis of both sides of this issue.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: stimulus

State of the Union

January 29, 2008 by Charlie

Early in his SOTU speech, President Bush highlighted two hot-button issues on the Hill — the economic stimulus package and earmark reform. “The temptation will be to load up the bill,” Bush said of the stimulus plan. “That would delay it or derail it, and neither option is acceptable.” Those lines drew applause from the GOP side of the aisle, but not from Democrats. It’s worth noting what Bush didn’t say — that he would veto the package if the Senate tinkers with it too much. For the complete transcript, click here.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: economic forecasts

Economics of Bidding and Estimating

January 25, 2008 by Charlie

Landscape service firms must do 2 things if they are to make money in today’s competitive Green Industry environment — (1) develop an accurate estimate of hourly field-labor costs and (2) develop a system to fully recover overhead expenses. Once this is accomplished, generating realistic (and profitable) bids and estimates becomes a much more straightforward task. Benchmarking the firm’s performance relative to similarly-sized businesses is also a mandatory managerial task for those who desire to see their business grow and prosper. More detailed information can be found in a presentation delivered at the recent education seminar held by the Southeast Texas Nursery Growers Association. Click here to view this presentation.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: bidding and estimating, landscape firms, pricing, service sector

Economic Damages from Drought in Southeast

January 23, 2008 by Charlie

So far, 35,000 out of the 79,000 green-industry employees in Georgia have lost their jobs, with another 30,000 in jeopardy of losing their jobs due to the historic drought. “The only ones left are pretty much the owners and their families,” said Sherry Loudermilk, exec. dir. of Ga. Green Industry Assoc. The industry in Georgia lost $3.15 billion in 2007 alone. Loudermilk has some suggestions about how the national green industry can help. GMPRO editor David Kuack also reports on how the Southeast drought is putting a big hurt on horticulture.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: drought effects, economic impacts

Profitability in a Maturing Marketplace

January 21, 2008 by Charlie

There is little doubt that the green industry has been characterized with unprecedented growth, innovation, and change over the last couple of decades. Yes, the fact that the green industry in the United States represents $148 billion in economic impacts and almost 2 million jobs nationally is impressive. The fact that nursery and floral production still represents one of the fast growing sectors in agriculture means profitability in the industry has been evidenced otherwise such growth would not have occurred. However, slowing growth in demand tighter margins (along with other aforementioned factors) point to a maturing market. Survival in the next decade will require a progressive mindset and perhaps a willingness to strengthen existing or develop new core competencies (which may incur greater risk).

While the crystal ball may be somewhat fuzzy in terms of the growth and nature of consumer demand, there is little doubt that innovativeness will continue to be a requisite skill in ensuring the survivability and profitability of green industry firms in the future. As the new competitive character of green industry maturity begins to hit full force, any of several strategic moves can strengthen a green industry firms’ competitive position including pruning the product line, improving value chain efficiency, trimming costs, accelerating marketing and sales promotion efforts, and acquiring struggling competitors.

For more on this subject, click here.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: profitability, strategy

Why you need a stategic business plan!

January 18, 2008 by Charlie

This morning has been filled with the stories and helpful advice of Dr. Pete Johnson at the 2008 TNLA Management Workshop regarding the ins and outs of strategic business planning. Pete contends (and I agree) that many companies today roll their eyes when the mere words strategic plan are mentioned. However, there are some very important reasons as to why companies should engage in this process. Besides those mentioned in the previous post (regarding the economic state of our economy), here are a few more to consider:

  • It serves as a roadmap for your business – provides a basic sense of direction and helps maintain focus on business objectives.
  • It is necessary to obtain capital from investors and/or bankers – to determine true economic potential relative to risks involved.
  • It helps evaluate business structure alternatives – reality check to protect you from proceeding with an idea that doesn’t make good “business sense.”
  • It provides a benchmark to evaluate results of previous strategies.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: strategy

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Go to Next Page »

About the Chair

  • About the Chairholder
  • Donors
  • Contacts

Advisory Commitee

  • Overview
  • Permanent Seats
  • Rotating Seats
  • Ex-Officio Members
  • Members Emeritus
  • Early History of the Ellison Chair

Multimedia

  • Webinars
  • Distinguished Lecture Series

Conferences/Workshops

  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)
View Charlie Hall's profile on LinkedIn
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
Texas A&M University System Member
  • Compact with Texans
  • Privacy and Security
  • Accessibility Policy
  • State Link Policy
  • Statewide Search
  • Veterans Benefits
  • Military Families
  • Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veteran's Portal
  • Equal Opportunity
  • Open Records/Public Information