• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Texas A&M Forest Service
  • Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  • Texas A&M College of Agrculture and Life Sciences
Ellison Chair in International Floriculture
Ellison Chair in International FloricultureTeaching, Research, Extension and Service
  • Menu
  • #1593 (no title)
  • Benefits of Plants and Greenscapes
  • Plants, Nature, and Health Initiative
  • Marketing & Economics
  • Water Resources
  • Sustainability
  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)

Who will economists vote for?

October 15, 2008 by Charlie

The title reflects a question that I have been asked several times by friends lately. I was surprised that anyone cared, but nonetheless, here is the answer — it depends. OK, I know what you’re thinking. That is the typical retort you might expect from an economist, but hear me out.

Much ado has been made of various lists of economists supporting Obama (click here) and those supporting McCain (click here). But a recent survey (click here) of over 500 economists drawn from a subset of members of the American Economic Association, indicated that “Not surprisingly, 88 percent of Democratic economists think Democratic Sen. Barack Obama would be best, while 80 percent of Republican economists pick Republican Sen. John McCain.” So obviously, there is a strong correlation between favored economic policies and political pursausion.

Why does this matter? Well, for the most part, we need to understand where folks are coming from when we read or listen to them. To me, it is important to know enough to know the difference.

For example, among the plethora of resources I consult each day, I regularly read the column in the NY Times of recent Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman (a very good Princeton economist) who has made no secret of his Democratic leanings. But I also read stuff from Martin Feldstein (another very good economist) who is a professor of economics at Harvard and President Emeritus of the National Bureau for Economic Research. Martin also happened to be Chairman of President Ronald Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisors, so obviously he has a Republican slant.

So when I read comments from these guys [and others], I can better understand WHY they they hold certain positions because I know from “whence they came,” so to speak. The same holds true with mainstream media pundits as well. Unbiased commentary is a rarity, so it behooves us to, again, know enough to know the difference.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste! So read, listen, debate, evaluate, discern — use your gray matter — to decide where you stand. Because as the saying goes: “if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything!”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: leadership

About the Chair

  • About the Chairholder
  • Donors
  • Contacts

Advisory Commitee

  • Overview
  • Permanent Seats
  • Rotating Seats
  • Ex-Officio Members
  • Members Emeritus
  • Early History of the Ellison Chair

Multimedia

  • Webinars
  • Distinguished Lecture Series

Conferences/Workshops

  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)
View Charlie Hall's profile on LinkedIn
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
Texas A&M University System Member
  • Compact with Texans
  • Privacy and Security
  • Accessibility Policy
  • State Link Policy
  • Statewide Search
  • Veterans Benefits
  • Military Families
  • Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veteran's Portal
  • Equal Opportunity
  • Open Records/Public Information