Transition time
Factors Affecting Growers’ Willingness to Adopt Sustainable Floriculture Practices
From the August 2009 issue of HortScience by Tanya Hall (Purdue University) et al:
In June to Oct. 2008, a U.S. floriculture survey was conducted to examine the factors affecting growers’ willingness to adopt sustainable practices. The factors affecting adoption of sustainable practices were evaluated in five areas: environmental regulations, customer value, growers’ attitudes toward sustainability, age, and operation size. A logistic regression model was used to examine factors affecting growers’ adoption of sustainable practices. Nearly two-thirds (65.2%) of respondents thought sustainability was very important to the environment. Similarly, more than half (63%) of the respondents had sustainable practices in their operations.
Although respondents had positive attitudes toward sustainability and the environment, these positive attitudes alone were unable to predict adoption behaviors. The two most important factors that affected adoption of sustainable practices were the concerns about implementation and the risk perceived by growers. Neither perceived customer value nor the stringency of state regulations affected the adoption of sustainable practices. The results from this study provide original insight into growers’ views of sustainability and identify the educational assistance needed by growers to overcome the factors affecting their adoption of sustainable practices.
The Source will Matter – Certified Sustainable Inputs – Dean Chaloupka's MySpace Blog | The Bloomin Biz
Register now for water webinar series
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E71XRCijH9E]
CLICK HERE to register for the first webinar of the series (see below).
August 17, 2009 – 2:00 p.m. CDT
Webinar 1 Topic:
What’s in Your Water? Water Quality and Treatment for Pathogens and Algae
Dr. Paul Fisher, University of Florida
September 15, 2009 – 11:00 a.m. CDT
Webinar 2 Topic:
Knowing Exactly When to Apply Irrigation Water
Dr. Peter Ling, Ohio State University
October 20, 2009 – 11:00 a.m. CDT
Webinar 3 Topic:
Water Management that Makes Cents!
Dr. Don Wilkerson, Texas A&M; University
Using Facebook for commerce
Most retailers use social media sites as a means to entice and direct consumers to another site to make a purchase. Now 1-800-Flowers.com is foregoing that extra step by enabling consumers to place orders directly on the company’s Facebook page (www.facebook.com/1800flowers).
“Facebook is redefining the social web, a cultural and social phenomenon that has changed the way we connect with one another,” said Jim McCann, CEO and Founder of 1-800-Flowers.com, in a press release. “In 1992, 1-800-Flowers was one of the first businesses to embrace the internet and in 1994 we were the first merchant of any kind to transact on AOL. Fifteen years later, we are extremely proud to again be the first — this time in launching a retail store inside Facebook, a bold step in unlocking the tremendous marketing potential of social media.”
With 1,847 fans as of 8:50 EST last night, 1-800-Flowers is a long way from unlocking the wallets and purses of the 250 million active Facebook users.
Source: Retail Wire
The long-run stock perspective
It’s always good to maintain perspective (click on graph to enlarge):
HT: Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner)
Top 1% now pays more taxes than bottom 95%
Newly released data from the IRS clearly debunks the conventional Beltway rhetoric that the “rich” are not paying their fair share of taxes.
Indeed, the IRS data shows that in 2007—the most recent data available—the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 40.4 percent of the total income taxes collected by the federal government. This is the highest percentage in modern history. By contrast, the top 1 percent paid 24.8 percent of the income tax burden in 1987, the year following the 1986 tax reform act.
Remarkably, the share of the tax burden borne by the top 1 percent now exceeds the share paid by the bottom 95 percent of taxpayers combined. In 2007, the bottom 95 percent paid 39.4 percent of the income tax burden. This is down from the 58 percent of the total income tax burden they paid twenty years ago.
To put this in perspective, the top 1 percent is comprised of just 1.4 million taxpayers and they pay a larger share of the income tax burden now than the bottom 134 million taxpayers combined.
Some in Washington say the tax system is still not progressive enough. However, the recent IRS data bolsters the findings of an OECD study released last year showing that the U.S.—not France or Sweden—has the most progressive income tax system among OECD nations. We rely more heavily on the top 10 percent of taxpayers than does any nation and our poor people have the lowest tax burden of those in any nation.
We are definitely overdue for some honesty in the debate over the progressivity of the nation’s tax burden before lawmakers enact any new taxes to pay for expanded health care.
Friedman on capitalism
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A]
Thirty years ago, in 1979, Milton Friedman—the Nobel Prize-winning economist and Britannica contributor who was born this day in 1912—famously “schooled” talk-show host Phil Donahue on the nature of greed and the virtues of capitalism.
HT: Britannica Blog
The cost of "reform"
The latest CBO report was released yesterday (click here) analyzing the specifications related to health insurance coverage that are reflected in the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act, which was released by the House Committee on Ways and Means on July 14. Here are the highlights (emphasis mine):
Looking ahead to the decade beyond 2019, CBO tries to evaluate the rate at which the budgetary impact of each of those broad categories would be likely to change over time. The net cost of the coverage provisions would be growing at a rate of more than 8 percent per year in nominal terms between 2017 and 2019; we would anticipate a similar trend in the subsequent decade. The reductions in direct spending would also be larger in the second decade than in the first, and they would represent an increasing share of spending on Medicare over that period; however, they would be much smaller at the end of the10-year budget window than the cost of the coverage provisions, so they would not be likely to keep pace in dollar terms with the rising cost of the coverage expansion. Revenue from the surcharge on high-income individuals would be growing at about 5 percent per year in nominal terms between 2017 and 2019; that component would continue to grow at a slower rate than the cost of the coverage expansion in the following decade. In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget window.
My take on this: If cost savings is the objective, the current plan will not get us there. Basically, it comes down to this — you can either expand health care coverage or reduce costs, but not both as the above analysis shows. It would take a miracle, not rhetoric, to pull that one off.