• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Texas A&M Forest Service
  • Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  • Texas A&M College of Agrculture and Life Sciences
Ellison Chair in International Floriculture
Ellison Chair in International FloricultureTeaching, Research, Extension and Service
  • Menu
  • #1593 (no title)
  • Benefits of Plants and Greenscapes
  • Plants, Nature, and Health Initiative
  • Marketing & Economics
  • Water Resources
  • Sustainability
  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)

Gas prices actually do influence driving behavior

May 12, 2008 by Charlie

The chart below shows the annual vehicle traffic volume, measured in billions of miles traveled in the U.S., on a moving 12-month basis through February 2008 from the Federal Highway Administration. The flat trend in traffic volume over the last year or more, along with the declines in each of the last four months through February 2008, appears to be the most significant adjustment to traffic volume in any comparable period during the last 25 years. High gas prices appear to be having an effect on driving habits.


Other behavior changes:
More bicycles are being sold.
More folks are taking mass transit.
More small cars are being sold.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: economic impacts, pricing, trends

Reasons for rising food prices

May 3, 2008 by Charlie

Ok, I realize that this post might seem peculiar at first given that this is a green industry oriented blog. But remember that the supply chain for our products is quite similar to that of perishable foods. Therefore, logically, any supply chain dynamics affecting one industry must also affect the other. Given that premise, let’s proceed.

Much attention has been placed in the media on the fact that market prices for major food commodities such as grains and vegetable oils have risen sharply to historic highs of more than 60 percent above levels just 2 years ago. Many factors have contributed to the runup in food commodity prices. Some factors reflect trends of slower growth in production and more rapid growth in demand, which have contributed to a tightening of world balances of grains and oilseeds over the last decade.

Recent factors that have further tightened world markets include increased global demand for biofuels feedstocks and adverse weather conditions in 2006 and 2007 in some major grain and oilseed producing areas.

Other factors that have added to global food commodity price inflation include the declining value of the U.S. dollar, rising energy prices, increasing agricultural costs of production, growing foreign exchange holdings by major food importing countries, and policies adopted recently by some exporting and importing countries to mitigate their own food price inflation.

In assessing prospects for the future, there are a number of uncertainties and concerns:

Global economic growth: If rapid growth continues, particularly in developing countries, it will continue to put upward pressure on food commodity prices through increases in food demand.

Energy prices: If petroleum prices continue to rise, costs of agricultural production will rise, as will the cost of processing, and the cost of transporting products to markets both within a country and exporting to other countries. Continued high petroleum prices will also sustain the global incentives to produce more biofuels.

Biofuels production: In USDA’s 10-year agricultural projections, global growth in biofuels production begins to slow in the next several years and production from grains and oilseeds flattens out in the next half decade. World food commodity prices are not projected to retreat to past levels. However, several years into the future, the underlying long-term trend in rapidly increasing global demand is expected once again to be the primary contributor to future upward pressure on food commodity
prices.

Supply response capacity of the global agricultural production system:
• Cost of inputs: Continued increases in production costs, especially in energy-related costs, will restrain the world’s production response. Higher costs for fertilizer, fuel, and seeds could cause farmers without access to credit to plant less than they otherwise would have, or to shift to crops requiring fewer inputs.

• Additional cropland (quantity and quality): What will be the long-run impact of higher world food commodity prices on the amount of land used to produce the crops? What is the productivity of the land that will be used to increase production?

• Water shortages: How quickly will constraints on the amount of water available for agricultural production become more widespread?

• New seed varieties and use of biotechnology: Will higher food prices encourage some countries to adopt the use of biotechnology, especially genetically modified seed for crops? Will future research focus more on yield-enhancing varieties rather than cost-reducing innovations?

• Biophysical response to climate change: How will climate change affect agricultural production? How will it change temperatures, precipitation, the length of growing seasons, and variability of yields? How, and under what circumstances, will climate change increase and/or reduce production? In affected regions, how difficult will it be for producers to shift to different crops, to adopt new cropping patterns, and to adjust production practices to the new environment?

With such low world stocks of food commodities, food prices are vulnerable to a production shortfall in one or more major production areas. If a significant shortfall occurs this year due to weather or disease, food prices might continue to rise sharply from the current high level.

Although trade flows can mitigate some of these effects, new or existing trade restrictions or barriers can exacerbate price impacts. However, if good crop production conditions exist in the Northern Hemisphere during the next 6 months, food commodity prices could retreat significantly from their current highs.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: international trade, pricing, trends

Mother's Day Projections

May 2, 2008 by Charlie

Here is a scoop on a news release coming out today by our Texas AgriLife Communications Team:

Experts Say Things Looking Rosy for Texas Floriculture This Mother’s Day
Author: Paul Schattenberg

While research shows U.S. consumers expect to spend a bit less on Mother’s Day this year, that likely will not affect the purchase of cut flowers and flowering plants for moms in Texas, according to industry experts.

According to the 2008 Mother’s Day Consumer Intentions and Actions Survey conducted by BIGresearch for the National Retail Federation, Americans expect to spend an average of $138.63 on Mom this year. This is slightly down from the 2007 average of $139.14.

But although a nationwide reduction in consumer spending for Mother’s Day is expected, those associated with the Texas green industry expect flower purchases to be as good or better than in 2007.

Dr. Charles Hall, Professor and Ellison Chair in International Floriculture at Texas A&M; University, said he expects the Texas floral industry to fare well this Mother’s Day due to a combination of timing and consumer confidence.

“In spite of the downturn in consumer spending for Mother’s Day predicted in the National Retail Federation survey, the same survey shows Americans intend to still spend more than $2 billion on flowers this Mother’s Day,” he said.

Hall added that the 2007 NRF study showed more than 72 percent of those surveyed purchased some sort of Mother’s Day flora at an average retail price of $27.59.

“Other gifts like jewelry, CDs, housewares and the like tend to be spread out among the holidays, but flowers are a traditional choice for holidays centered around women,” he said. Hall also noted that overall consumer confidence is still high in Texas and that the likelihood of consumers purchasing flowers and other floral items “directly correlates” to that confidence.

“Not only that,” he said, “but (economic stimulus) rebate checks are now being mailed out and that will give more impetus to spending. Some of that money will go toward Mother’s Day gifts, which would include flowers.”

“Even with the slowdown in the economy, the amount that will be spent on flowers for Mother’s Day throughout Texas probably will be as much or more than last year,” said Jack Cross, past president of the Texas State Florists’ Association and owner of Arthur Pfeil Florist in San Antonio. “Mother’s Day is a traditional holiday, and the Texas consumer is traditional about Mother’s Day gift purchases, especially when it comes to buying flowers.”

In addition, Easter came much earlier this year than in years past, giving more time for the consumers to “recover” before their Mother’s Day flower purchase, Cross added.

When it comes to cut flowers, Texans usually prefer buying roses, carnations, tulips and lilies for Mom from their neighborhood florist, he said. Azaleas, begonias and Calla lilies are among the most popular flowering plants purchased.

“If someone is going to buy from a garden center instead of a floral shop, then that purchase will usually be something like a rose bush or a hibiscus plant,” he said.

While the product mix between Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day couldn’t be more different, the sales dollars generated from each are about the same, said Stan Pohmer, executive director of the national Flower Promotion Organization, based in Minnetonka, Minn.

“Mother’s Day accounts for about 25 percent of all floral holiday sales,” Pohmer said. Cut flowers represent about 46 percent of Mother’s Day floral transactions, outdoor bedding plants and hanging baskets represent about 37 percent, and flowering house plants and foliage represent about 15 percent.

Pohmer added that 64 percent of Mother’s Day flower purchases are made by women. However, he cautioned, floral sales in general may not be as sure-fire in the future as they have been in the past.

“While the floral industry has previously thought of itself as recession-proof, a more realistic term these days would probably be recession-resistant,” he said.

But in the Lone Star State, flower producers, greenhouse growers and retailers are all poised to make sure Texas moms gets their mums – or whatever floral they desire.

“Things look good this year for flower retailers and the greenhouse floral industry in Texas,” said Richard de los Santos, state marketing coordinator for horticulture with the Texas Department of Agriculture. “Flower growers are pretty well sold out of product and have made commitments to their retailers.”

“There seems to be a growing desire for people to give plants that continue to live and give,” said Marilyn Good, communications director for the Texas Nursery and Landscape Association in Austin. “Blooming potted plants are gaining favor, and the real up-and-coming gift plant is the orchid, which has a hard-to-grow reputation, but many are low maintenance.”

David Rodriguez, Texas AgriLife Extension Service horticulturist for Bexar County, agrees mothers often prefer potted plants or bedding plants to cut flowers.

“Some good choices for live plants for Mother’s Day might be Belinda’s Dream and Grandma’s Yellow roses, which are Texas SuperStar plants. This means, among other things, they are attractive, unique flowering plants suited to Texas. And they consistently perform well, regardless of a person’s gardening expertise.”

Other Texas SuperStar plants that may serve as good selections are the ‘Gold Star’ Esperanza and Perennial Hibiscus, he said. And the moth orchid makes a good choice for a beautiful, low-maintenance indoor flowering plant.

“But regardless of flower selection, there is always something unique about Mother’s Day,” added Hall. “Mother’s Day tends to supercede economic concerns in a ways other holidays do not. People know they can always rely on Mom during the tough times, so they aren’t going to forget that when Mother’s Day comes around.”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: consumer confidence, retail, retail sector, trends

A good example of cross price elasticity of demand

May 2, 2008 by Charlie

From today’s NT Times: In what automobile industry analysts are calling a first, about one in five vehicles sold in the United States was a compact or subcompact car during April, based on monthly sales data released Thursday. Almost a decade ago, when sport utility vehicles were at their peak of popularity, only one in every eight vehicles sold was a small car. Click here for full story.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: trends

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11

About the Chair

  • About the Chairholder
  • Donors
  • Contacts

Advisory Commitee

  • Overview
  • Permanent Seats
  • Rotating Seats
  • Ex-Officio Members
  • Members Emeritus
  • Early History of the Ellison Chair

Multimedia

  • Webinars
  • Distinguished Lecture Series

Conferences/Workshops

  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)
View Charlie Hall's profile on LinkedIn
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
Texas A&M University System Member
  • Compact with Texans
  • Privacy and Security
  • Accessibility Policy
  • State Link Policy
  • Statewide Search
  • Veterans Benefits
  • Military Families
  • Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veteran's Portal
  • Equal Opportunity
  • Open Records/Public Information