Foreclosure filings dropped 9.6% from December, RealtyTrac reports, largely due to the combined mitigation efforts of banks and the government – but remain 18% higher than a year ago. In January, one in every 466 houses was the subject of a foreclosure filing. Yesterday, Foreclosures.com said completed foreclosures plunged by more than 25% in January from December, to 72,694 from 97,841. Preforeclosure filings – an indicator of future completed foreclosures – also fell 12%. “Efforts last year by government and industry to lay the groundwork for housing recovery finally are yielding the hoped-for slowdown in the foreclosure hemorrhage,” Foreclosure.com president Alexis McGee said.
The new New Deal
The House and the Senate have drafted a compromise stimulus bill totalling $789.5B, all but guaranteeing the largest economic rescue program since Roosevelt’s New Deal. Obama hailed the “endeavor of enormous scope and scale,” though it may turn out to be just a down payment on efforts to turn around the economy. The package, which exceeds the cost of the entire Iraq war since the 2003 invasion, will expand unemployment insurance, streamline health-care delivery, give Washington more control over local education spending and tilt federal assistance to the poor. Around 35% of the package is earmarked for tax cuts. Obama and Democratic leaders lowered their expectations for job creation to 3.5M from 4M. Both chambers could approve the compromise bill by the end of the week.
Breaking down the stimulus package
Source: Washington Post
Light at the end of a long tunnel
If you noticed, I started a new poll that will last during the spring season. It appears on the right side of this page and asks about monthly sales compared to this time last year. Feel free to participate each month so that we can gauge how we are progressing through the season. Vote once, but not often!
Cool tool: State by state economic indicators
CNN-Money has a cool interactive map showing economic indicators for the 50 states. It demonstrates some of the points I have made in earlier posts about the recessionary effects not being felt equally across the country.
The internet overtakes newspapers as news source
In 2008, for the first time ever, more Americans relied on the Internet for national and international news than on newspapers. In December 2008, 40% of those surveyed said they get most of their news on the Internet, up from 24% in September 2007. 35% still mainly read newspapers, and 70% say television is their primary source of news.
Source: Pew Research Center
Selling the news vs. reporting it?
Some selected excerpts from the Time Magazine Cover Story “Why We’re So Gloomy”:
“I haven’t really been able to sort out exactly why there has been this degree of pessimism.”
~Former President Bush
Well, why are Americans so gloomy, fearful and even panicked about the current economic slump?
In one of history’s most painful paradoxes, U.S. consumers seem suddenly disillusioned with the American Dream of rising prosperity even as capitalism and democracy have consigned the Soviet Union to history’s trash heap. Hard times are forcing some people to turn their back on the American Dream.
“Whining” hardly captures the extent of the gloom Americans feel as the current downturn enters its 14th month. The slump is the longest, if not the deepest, since the Great Depression. Traumatized by layoffs that have cost more than 1.2 million jobs during the slump, U.S. consumers have fallen into their deepest funk in years.
While some economists have described the current slump as a near depression, that phrase overstates the case if it is taken as a comparison with the period 1929-33, when the U.S. economy contracted by nearly a third. The D word becomes more valid, especially with a small d, when it is used to compare the growth rate of the 1930s, which averaged 0.5% a year, with the expected sluggishness of the next decade, which some economists predict will see an average growth rate of 2%.
“I’m worried if my kids can earn a decent living and buy a house,” says Tony Lentini, vice president of public affairs for Mitchell Energy in Houston. “I wonder if this will be the first generation that didn’t do better than their parents. There’s a genuine feeling that the country has gotten way off track, and neither political party has any answers. Americans don’t see any solutions.”
The deeper tremors emanate from the kind of change that occurs only once every few decades. America is going through a historic transition from a heedless borrow-and-spend society to one that stresses savings and investment. When this recession is over, America will not simply go back to business as usual.
The underlying change in the way American consumers and business leaders think about saving and spending will make the recovery one of the slowest in history and the next decade one of lowered expectations. Many economists agree that the U.S. will face at least several years of very modest growth as consumers and companies work off the vast debt they assumed in the last decade.
The conditions that led to today’s transition economy go back several decades. Americans have suffered a long-term stagnation of their earnings. The median income of U.S. families has virtually stood still since 1973, showing an annual gain of just 0.3% a year.
The recent debt binge took place on a colossal scale in every sector of the economy. Runaway federal deficits have more than tripled the national debt. Meanwhile, consumers increased their IOUs from $1.4 trillion to $3.7 trillion last year. And U.S. industry raised its debt from $1.4 trillion to $3.5 trillion over the same period. The reckless borrowing made a reckoning inevitable.
So far, though, no reprieve from layoffs is anywhere in sight. Economists say U.S. companies will shed more than 1 million jobs in fields ranging from banking to aerospace, a pace even faster than last year’s. “It’s become almost like a poker game to see who can cut the most,” says employment analyst Lacey. “There’s a kind of corporate frenzy.”
GM’s plans to close 25 plants and cut 74,000 jobs, or 19% of its work force, scarcely addresses such problems as why it takes the company up to a year longer than the Japanese to redesign its cars.
This was from the January 13, 1992 edition of Time Magazine, and the opening quote was from President George H.W. Bush, and the article was about the relatively mild 1990-1991 recession. Note: The text above was altered slightly so that the specific time period was not obvious. Notice the distinct similarities to the reporting about today’s economy.
The July 1990 to March 1991 recession was one of the shortest in U.S. history (8 months according to the NBER) and relatively mild: the jobless rate averaged only 6.1% during the recession and reached a high of only 6.8% by the end of the recession (although it continued to rise after the recession ended, see chart above). I think there is a general consensus that the 1990-1991 was nowhere near as severe as the three previous recessions of the 1970s and 1980s, and it’s a fact that the 1973-1975 and 1981-1982 recessions were twice as long (16 months) as the 1990-1991 recession. And yet, to continue making the point, here is what the media were reporting about the 1990-1991 recession:
“In 1991 the average American expressed more pessimism about the future than at any time since the Great Depression.”
“There is no question but this is the worst economic time since the Great Depression.”
“Sluggish economic growth this year will cap the worst three-year period centered on a recession since the Great Depression.”
“Forecasts for a weak recovery in 1992 suggest the period since 1990 will be the worst for the economy since the Great Depression.”
“…..the worst plunge since the Great Depression.”
“The banking industry has plunged to its lowest point since the Great Depression.”
“This is the most severe economic dislocation we’ve had since the 1930s. Few are immune.”
“Mr. Barry, a past president of the Chamber of Commerce, said 50 For Sale signs are just the tip of the iceberg, since many bank foreclosures and repossessions do not carry signs. “It’s not a recession, it’s a depression,” he said.”
“….with the US economy locked in a recession and more people out of work since the Great Depression.”
“….the worst (retail) sales period on record since the Great Depression.”
“This recession is hitting white-collar workers more heavily than any since the Great Depression of the 1930s.”
Again, sound familiar? Links available here.
HT: Alex Tabarrok at Marginal Revolution and Mark Perry at Ca
rpe Diem.
Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior
Recently finished the book entitled “Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior.” A quick read that makes some interesting points about irrational behavior; something I knew little about of course!
The main point of the book is that we all act irrationally from time to time (some of us lots of the time) and there are predictable forces that cause us to act irrationally including the following:
- Loss aversion – this is a form of playing not to lose, making decisions in order to cut our losses, or avoid further losses.
- Commitment – this is our tendency to hold fast to our course of action in the face of accumulating losses. Their example: Steve Spurrier and the Gators. When Spurrier came to UF in the early 90’s the SEC was a grind-it-out conference where coaches played, conservatively ( i.e. not to lose). Spurrier brought in the Run-N-Gun and started whipping the rest of the old, storied SEC programs. In response, the other teams stayed committed, and stuck even harder to their old models. And the Gators kept winning…much to the chagrin of us UT alums.
- Value attribution – we attribute value to people or things based on quick impressions. In other words, if the right people like something we attribute greater value to that thing than if the wrong people like it.
- Diagnosis bias – once we diagnose a situation we see the world through the lens of that diagnosis and all of reality conforms to our bias.
- Fairness perception – we’ll often act against our own best interests if we feel that we are being treated unfairly. There is a cool experiment he talks about involving two subjects. Someone offers them a sum of money, let’s say $100. One person gets to divide it any way they want and the other person can decide to accept or reject that division. If the second accepts they both get the money per the division by the first. If the second rejects, they both get nothing. Most of the time the first person divides it 50-50, the second accepts and they walk away happy. But, when the first person makes an imbalanced division – let’s say he keeps $70 and offers the other $30 – in pretty much every case the second rejects it. In either case, whether it was a 50-50 or a 70-30 split, the second person would have come out to the good, but in the second case they rejected their own gain because of the fairness perception.
- Altruism-Pleasure conflict – people will perform better for altruistic motives than for rewards. In other words, if someone does something for altruistic motives and then you come back and offer them a reward for doing the same thing, you will often find them losing motivation and/or performing worse. You gotta read that chapter to understand how it works.
- Group Conformity – when in group settings, people tend to stifle their own opinions, often when their own opinions are patently correct and the groups are patently false, to go along with the group.
Want to hear more from one of the authors himself? Click on the video below (it is preceded by a short ad).
http://www.hulu.com/aol/http%3A%2F%2Fvideo%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fpartner%2Fhulu%2Fbusiness%2Dbook%2Dbriefs%2Dbusiness%2Dbook%2Dbriefs%2Dsway%2Dby%2Dori%2Dbrafman%2Dand%2Drom%2Dbrafman%2Fbw8yXCbaH%5F%5Fdf2%5Fw%5F%5FD8DBP7hOyjxWAm/embed/c1iqyuRVtZHIAM1xTq8dyA
Go to the book website for even more information.
Where will it all go?
Landscape benchmarking reports available
How does your company’s financial performance compare with other lawn and landscape companies in your area — across the country for that matter? Find out in the newly updated 2008 Operating Cost Study for the Green Industry report. More than 200 companies nationwide contributed data from their 2007 income statements, balance sheets, and operating costs to this report, which features trending analysis for the industry. Click here to order your copy.
Lawn & Landscape magazine recently released its Benchmarking Your Business report. In an uncertain market riddled with variables, the one thing landscape contractors can control is their numbers. This report is a comprehensive guide to your profit and loss. Use it to measure business success. Click here to obtain a PDF version of this report.