• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Texas A&M Forest Service
  • Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  • Texas A&M College of Agrculture and Life Sciences
Ellison Chair in International Floriculture
Ellison Chair in International FloricultureTeaching, Research, Extension and Service
  • Menu
  • #1593 (no title)
  • Benefits of Plants and Greenscapes
  • Plants, Nature, and Health Initiative
  • Marketing & Economics
  • Water Resources
  • Sustainability
  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)

The Case for Optimism

August 27, 2010 by Charlie

From today’s Wall Street Journal article “The Case for Optimism” by Ross Devol, executive director of economic research at the Milken Institute:

Gloom and doom is the hallmark of the current economic debate, as the most recent congressional testimony from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke demonstrates. Despite Mr. Bernanke’s generally upbeat message on the Fed’s official forecast, which calls for moderate economic growth of somewhere between 3.0% to 3.5% this year, the market and the media fixated on his acknowledgment that the outlook was “unusually uncertain.” Those words have only reverberated in the past few weeks, bolstering economic pessimists.

There’s a point at which pessimism becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy, scaring businesses away from investing or hiring. The dark tone of today’s discourse is at risk of doing just that.

The Milken Institute’s new study, “From Recession to Recovery: Analyzing America’s Return to Growth” is based on extensive and dispassionate econometric analysis. It concludes that the U.S. economy remains more flexible and resilient—and has more underlying momentum—than is generally acknowledged. In fact, our projections show cause for measured optimism: A return to modest but sustainable growth is close at hand.

America’s businesses are capable of navigating around policy uncertainty and the twists and turns of a volatile global economy. While slow private-sector job growth is to be expected in the early stages of a recovery, the U.S. should add 1.5 million jobs in 2010, 3.1 million in 2011, and 2.6 million in 2012. That will translate into real GDP growth of 3.3% in 2010, 3.7% in 2011, and 3.8% in 2012.

In this pessimistic climate, this forecast will likely be considered contrarian. So why is our economic outlook more sanguine than the current consensus? For one, robust (albeit moderating) economic growth in developing countries, particularly in Asia, will provide support for U.S. exports. Look no further than Caterpillar, which reported a doubling of its earnings in the second quarter of 2010 and whose product line is sold out for the rest of the year.

Improved business confidence is already spurring strong investment in equipment and software. Record-low U.S. long-term interest rates are supporting the recovery. And the benign inflationary environment allows the Fed to keep short-term interest rates near zero until late this year, or even into 2011 if it desires.

Historical context offers further reason to expect a rebound. The peak-to-trough decline in real GDP during this recession was 4.1%, making it the most severe downturn since World War II. But throughout the postwar period, the rate of economic recovery from past recessions has been proportional to the depth of the decline experienced. While this relationship has been somewhat variable, it is well-established. Our projections for GDP growth are above consensus but are substantially below a normal rate of recovery after a recession of this severity.

The naysayers are right that there’s a “new normal” economy, but it’s not that the potential long-term growth rate of the U.S. is substantially diminished, as they say. It’s that this time, the fulfillment of pent-up demand will be subdued because consumers were living so far above their means during the bubble years. Nevertheless, consumer durables and business investment in equipment will see some previously postponed purchases finally happen—if not this year, certainly by 2011 and 2012.

What needs to happen on the policy front in order to build momentum?

In the first place, small businesses need access to more bank credit to create jobs. Banks feel conflicted by calls from the Obama administration to increase lending while regulators are instructing them to add to their reserves. Regulators need to be reminded that some risk is necessary in a market economy.

The White House also should press Congress to pass legislation modernizing Cold War–era restrictions on exports of technology products and services that are already commercially available from our allies. This would boost U.S. exports and reduce the deficit. And if the White House is serious about doubling exports by 2015, it needs to push trade deals with South Korea, Colombia and Costa Rica through Congress.

For its part, Congress must move immediately to restore the lapsed R&D tax credit. Even better, it should expand the credit and make it permanent.

Congress also should pass legislation to temporarily extend the Bush tax cuts that are set to expire at the end of this year. It’s important not to remove any economic stimulus as long as the sustainability of the recovery is in question.

Another must-do: by 2012, Congress needs a credible long-term plan in place to reduce the deficit. If it doesn’t, international financial markets might force our hand by demanding a higher rate of return on U.S. Treasurys.

Washington has to focus like a laser on helping businesses create jobs, while the rest of us should avoid talking ourselves out of a recovery by dwelling on the doom and gloom. The U.S. economy has already adapted to serious imbalances in record time: There’s ample reason to believe in its dynamism in the months and years ahead.

Mr. DeVol is executive director of economic research at the Milken Institute, a nonprofit economic think tank based in Santa Monica, CA.

See related excellent post today from Scott Grannis: “20 Bullish Charts.”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: economic forecasts, recovery

Water webinar series upcoming

August 16, 2010 by Charlie

A new series of online water quality and recycling webinars begins August 18 to help growers successfully manage water quality issues and recycle irrigation water.

This education program to promote water conservation is co-sponsored by the Water Education Alliance for Horticulture (a collaborative program hosted by the University of Florida with industry partners), OFA – an Association of Horticulture Professionals, the Society of American Florists, and the Florida Nursery Growers and Landscape Association. The series of 30-minute live presentations will feature both new research and practical guidelines.

Registration is free at www.watereducationalliance.org (click on “workshops”) for this series of online presentations. Space is limited, so sign up early.

  • Water Treatment Technologies and Recycling — Paul Fisher, University of Florida — August 18 at 2pm, EST
  • Biology of Waterborne Pathogens — Rob Wick, University of Massachusetts — Sept. 17 at 2pm, EST
  • Ecological Approaches to Water Treatment — Loren Oki, University of California & Sarah White, Clemson University — Nov. 17 at 2pm, EST
  • Nutritional Aspects of Water Quality — Bill Argo, Blackmore Co. — Jan. 20 at 2pm, EST

Filed Under: News Tagged With: water, webinars

State by state breakdown of the recovery

August 5, 2010 by Charlie

Filed Under: News

Are we sliding back into recession?

August 4, 2010 by Charlie

Robert Barr’s comments from the latest trend tracker:

Is the recovery petering out?  Are we at the onset of another dip into recession?  The latest news seems ominous, and even former Federal Reserve Chairman Greenspan said in mid-July that “the economy hit an invisible wall in early June.”

There are some hopeful signs, however, including a show of resiliency in the well-respected economic activity indexes published by the Institute of Supply Management.  And monetary policy remains in gear for economic growth, with continued low interest rates.

One issue that makes the short-term forecast particularly challenging at this point is the impact Washington is having on the economy.  At a minimum, it’s creating additional uncertainty that makes expanding businesses and hiring more workers at this point in the recovery even more an act of faith that it usually is.

The chief executive of Verizon Communications, Ivan Seidenberg, said it clearly in June: “By reaching into virtually every sector of economic life, the government is injecting uncertainty into the marketplace.”  The result?  More difficulty for business in raising capital, expanding existing businesses, and creating new businesses –the last thing this economy needs now.

Add to that the tax hike in store at the beginning of 2011 with the expiration of the 2003 Bush tax cuts, the uneasiness over the impact of the health care law, and concerns over the expanding federal debt load.  These costs will impede the economic recovery, especially a few years from now, as interest rates rise and the cost of servicing the national debt takes bigger and bigger chunks of our tax revenue.

So it’s easy to talk yourself into a lot of pessimism about the economy.  But will these concerns strangle our nascent recovery?  Will government policy push us into another round of recession over the next year?

Well, probably not, or so we’re thinking.  While we recognize the burden Washington is placing on the economy and would argue that economic growth will be measurably less in the coming year than it could have been with better federal economic policy, we don’t think it’s enough to smother the recovery.  Productivity growth and improved technology keep the recovery going.  As for the 2011 tax increases, they’ll be smaller than those imposed on the economy in the early 1990s, and nobody today speaks of the Clinton recession.  Monetary policy had a lot to do with maintaining economic growth then, and policy today is even more stimulative.

So although we think we’ll avoid a double-dip recession in 2010-11, economic growth over the next three or four years will be underwhelming, we believe.  There are several elements of the Congressional and Administration approach to the economy that are damaging the entrepreneurial climate (see, for example, the labor policies that push up wages through politics and not productivity, the treatment of Chrysler bondholders relative to the auto workers union, and threat of imposing cap-and-trade on American businesses and households) – but we think we’ll get through the next year with the recovery intact and, in fact, stronger than it appears to be now.

But we can’t escape the conclusion that the biggest economic risk may be the continued apparent antipathy toward commercial activity from Washington, coupled with the resulting increase in entrepreneurial uncertainty.

Robert Barr is an economist based in Virginia.


Filed Under: News Tagged With: recession, trends

Who will survive the downsizing?

August 4, 2010 by Charlie

Click here to see a short (02:13 min) video clip regarding the downsizing we’ve seen in recent years in the green industry.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: differentiation, trends, value proposition

GDP positive in 2nd quarter, but disappoints some

August 3, 2010 by Charlie

The GDP report from the BEA raised a lot of concerns about the economic recovery, based on headlines and reports like this:

1. Steep decline in GDP growth raises alarms,
2. US recovery loses steam,  
3. Double-dip feared as US economic growth loses pace, and
4. The closer you look at the GDP report, the uglier it gets, etc. 

Mark Perry comments:  But how does GDP growth in this recovery (assuming the recovery started in third quarter of 2009) over the last four quarters (1.6%, 5%, 3.7% and 2.4%) compare to output growth in the four quarters following the last two recessions in 1990-1991 and 2001?  Pretty good actually, see the graph above showing real GDP growth in the one-year periods (four quarters) following the last three recessions.

Sure, real GDP growth has slowed from 5% to 3.7% to 2.4% over the last three quarters, but following the 2001 recession real GDP slowed even more, from 3.5% to 2.1% to 2% to 0.1%.  And looking at the average growth over the four quarters following the last three recessions, the average 3.18% real GDP growth over the last year was higher than the 1.93% following the 2001 recession and higher than the 2.63% following the 1990-1991 recession.  Keep in mind that the economic recovery that started in 1991 was the longest (120 months) and strongest economic expansion in the history of the U.S.   

So what about a headline like “U.S. economic expansion stronger now than at the beginning of the last two recoveries?”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: recession, recovery

Water issues webinars

July 30, 2010 by Charlie

Free online presentations to help growers in  dealing with water issues
A new series of online water quality and recycling webinars begins August 18 to help growers successfully manage water quality issues and recycle irrigation water.
This education program to promote water conservation is co-sponsored by the Water Education Alliance for Horticulture (a collaborative program hosted by the University of Florida with industry partners), OFA – an Association of Horticulture Professionals, the Society of American Florists, and the Florida Nursery Growers and Landscape Association. The series of 30-minute live presentations will feature both new research and practical guidelines. Registration is free at www.watereducationalliance.org (click on “workshops”) for this series of online presentations. Space is limited, so sign up early. 

Filed Under: News Tagged With: water

Beware of Scorched-Earth Strategies in Climate Debates

July 28, 2010 by Charlie

Dr. Rob Stavins, Director of Harvard’s Environmental Economics program and opening Seeley Conference keynote speaker, has posted an overview of the recent happenings in  Washington pertaining to the apparent collapse last week of U.S. Senate consideration of a meaningful climate policy. Click here to read his HRR comments (HRR = highly recommended reading).

Filed Under: News Tagged With: climate change, environmental footprint

How Texas Avoided the Real Estate Bubble: Market-Oriented Land Use Policies

July 25, 2010 by Charlie

Interesting post by Mark Perry today (including graph below) regarding the article How Texas Avoided the Great Recession:

“One reason that Texas did so well is that it fully escaped the “housing bubble” that did so much damage in California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada and other states (see chart above). One key factor was the state’s liberal, market oriented land use policies. This served to help keep the price of land low while profligate lending increased demand. More importantly, still sufficient new housing was built, and affordably. By contrast, places with highly restrictive land use policies (California, Florida and other places, saw prices rise to unprecedented heights), making it impossible for builders to supply sufficient new housing at affordable prices.

Speculation is often blamed as having contributed to the higher house prices that developed in California and Florida. This is correct. Moreover, with some of the strongest demand in the United States, Texas would seem to have been a candidate for rampant speculation. After all, it happened back in the 1970s when a huge oversupply of housing, industrial, retail and office space collapsed in the face of falling energy prices.

Yet the speculators were not drawn to the metropolitan areas of Texas. This is because speculators or “flippers” are not drawn by plenty, but by perceived scarcity. In housing, a sure road to scarcity is to limit the supply of buildable land by outlawing development on much that might otherwise be available.

However, the speculators did not miss California and Florida. Nor did they miss Las Vegas or Phoenix, where the price of land for new housing rose between five and 10 times as the housing bubble developed. Despite their near limitless expanse of land, much of it was off limits to building, and the exorbitant price increases were thus to be expected.”

MP: The graph below shows that Texas never had a real estate bubble like those in California, Florida, Arizona or Texas. Consequently, Texas never had the real estate crash like in the other states. This article presents an interesting perspective about how restrictive land use policies contributed to the real estate bubbles around the country, and how Texas escaped the Great Recession due to more liberal land use policies.

houseprices

Filed Under: News Tagged With: housing industry

Role of Immigrants in U.S. Labor Market

July 24, 2010 by Charlie

People born in other countries are a growing presence in the U.S. labor force. In 2009, more than 1 in 7 people in the U.S. labor force were born elsewhere; 15 years earlier, only 1 in 10 was foreign born. About 40 percent of the foreign-born labor force in 2009 was from Mexico and Central America, and more than 25 percent was from Asia.

Today CBO released an update to its November 2005 report on the role of immigrants in the U.S. labor market. That earlier report included data through 2004; this update, the first of several on various aspects of immigration, incorporates data through 2009 from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Surveys. The update includes various tables showing statistics on the number of foreign-born workers, the countries from which they have come, their educational attainment, the types of jobs they hold, and their earnings.

The Role of Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: An Update

View more presentations from Congressional Budget Office.

Some highlights include:

  • People born in other countries represent a substantial and growing segment of the U.S. labor force—that is, people with a job or looking for one. In 2009, 24 million members of the labor force were foreign born, up from 21 million in 2004. However, the growth of the foreign-born labor force was much slower between 2004 and 2009 than between 1994 and 2004.
  • In 2009, over half of the foreign-born workers from Mexico and Central America did not have a high school diploma or GED credential, as compared with just 6 percent of native-born workers. Yet nearly half of the foreign-born workers from places other than Mexico and Central America had at least a bachelor’s degree, as compared with 35 percent of native-born workers.
  • Over time, participants in the U.S. labor force from Mexico and Central America have become more educated. In 2009, they had completed an average of 9.8 years of schooling—up from 9.5 years in 2004; 55 percent lacked a high school diploma or GED credential—down from 59 percent in 2004; and among 16- to 24-year-olds, 50 percent were not in school and were not high school graduates—down from 60 percent in 2004. Nevertheless, those born in Mexico and Central America constitute an increasingly large share of the least educated portions of the labor force.
  • To a considerable extent, educational attainment determines the role of foreign-born workers in the labor market. In 2009, 70 percent of workers born in Mexico and Central America were employed in occupations that have minimal educational requirements, such as construction laborer and dishwasher; only 23 percent of native-born workers held such jobs.
  • Foreign-born workers who came to the United States from places other than Mexico and Central America were employed in a much broader range of occupations. Nevertheless, they were more than twice as likely as native-born workers to be in fields such as computer and mathematical sciences, which generally require at least a college education. Their average weekly earnings were similar to those of native-born men and women.
  • On average, the weekly earnings of men from Mexico and Central America who worked full time were just over half those of native-born men; women from Mexico and Central America earned about three-fifths of the average weekly earnings of native-born women.

This report was prepared by Nabeel Alsalam of CBO’s Health and Human Resources Division.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: immigration reform, labor

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 43
  • Go to Next Page »

About the Chair

  • About the Chairholder
  • Donors
  • Contacts

Advisory Commitee

  • Overview
  • Permanent Seats
  • Rotating Seats
  • Ex-Officio Members
  • Members Emeritus
  • Early History of the Ellison Chair

Multimedia

  • Webinars
  • Distinguished Lecture Series

Conferences/Workshops

  • Executive Academy for Growth & Leadership (EAGL)
View Charlie Hall's profile on LinkedIn
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
Texas A&M University System Member
  • Compact with Texans
  • Privacy and Security
  • Accessibility Policy
  • State Link Policy
  • Statewide Search
  • Veterans Benefits
  • Military Families
  • Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veteran's Portal
  • Equal Opportunity
  • Open Records/Public Information